Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03099
Original file (BC 2013 03099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03099
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and 
Thailand.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, does not 
reflect his service time in Vietnam and Thailand from 1973-1974.  
In Jan 1973, he was given orders to Vietnam.  In Mar 1973, the 
Air Force turned their facility over to the Marines and he was 
transferred to Thailand.  His dental records reflect that on 
5 Mar 1973, he was transferred to “Ubon RTAFB.”  He returned to 
the United States in Mar 1974.

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD Form 214 and Standard Forms 600, Chronological Record of 
Medical Care.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period 27 Aug 1970 through 
28 Mar 1974 reflects one year of Foreign Service.

His AF Form 910, TSgt, SSgt, and Sgt Performance Report, for the 
period 6 Jan 1973 through 24 Sep 1973, item 4, Organization, 
Location and Command reflects “8th Supply Squadron Ubon Afld, 
Thailand (PACAF).”

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  DPAPP states that Foreign Service 
for Thailand is reflected in the applicant’s records.  However, 
his master personnel records failed to provide any documents 
that substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam.

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 19 Sep 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

_______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR 2013-
03099 in Executive Session on 3 Apr 2014, under the provisions 
of AFI 36-2603:

      , Panel Chair
      , Member
      , Member



The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-
2013-03099 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 23 Jun 2013, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 19 Aug 2013.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 2013.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01208

    Original file (BC-2013-01208.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01208 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflects...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05390

    Original file (BC 2013 05390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05390 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in Thailand (administratively corrected) and Vietnam. However, there was no evidence provided or located in the applicant’s personnel records to substantiate he served in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04655

    Original file (BC-2011-04655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s requests...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00335

    Original file (BC-2012-00335.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00335 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: 1) Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) (Will be administratively corrected to reflect the VSM w/one Bronze Service Star (VSM w/1BSS). We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05724

    Original file (BC 2013 05724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05724 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for his foreign service in Thailand and Guam (Administratively corrected), and Okinawa. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00183

    Original file (BC 2009 00183.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00183 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to show service in Vietnam. He served at Ubon RTAFB, Thailand from 6 September 1971 to 9 September 1972, and it was during this time he indicated he was sent TDY to Bien Hoa AB, Vietnam....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 03206

    Original file (BC 2010 03206.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and Thailand. The VSM is awarded to all members of the United States Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 1965 and 28 Mar 1973, in the area of eligibility. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2010- 03206 in Executive Session on 14 Feb 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03847

    Original file (BC-2012-03847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03847 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). The RVCM is awarded to members of the US armed forces who, during the period 1...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01222

    Original file (BC-2011-01222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01222 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1) His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor and one Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (AFOUA w/V & 1BOLC), and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02264

    Original file (BC-2007-02264.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He is now finding out that various VA benefits are predicated upon actual in-country Vietnam service, even though he was awarded a Bronze Star Medal (BSM) for his Southeast Asia (SEA) service and his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...